I also will do without discussing the term "Crimes against Humanity" and without detailed enquiries into the legal character of the high altitude ex [ ... ]
I first want to point out that Weltz did not personally order Rascher's assignment to his institute. This was proved by the affidavits of Wendt and [ ... ]
Here I am referring to an incident that happened later. However in consideration of the connection with the abetting problem, I first want to deal w [ ... ]
was a prosecution witness of importance. No. 9 of my document, I would like to substitute for the following explanations, which I have already subm [ ... ]
experiments and with those, viz. Romberg and Rascher, they discussed the details and chocked over them. Then they informed the persons in authority [ ... ]
Apart from that the Prosecution seems to raise the question whether or not Ruff or Weltz could possibly prevent Rascher's experiments from being car [ ... ]
It is Point 11. The Prosecution did not make it clear how Weltz could have prevented Rascher's own experiments. But from various remarks we can co [ ... ]
Since no period of time was set for the beginning of the experiments, Weltz did not at first notice that Rascher was not in Munich. Ps soon as Welt [ ... ]
the answer to Schnitzler's question in Document NO-263. Rascher had also shown this telegram to Romberg at an earlier stage in the experiments and [ ... ]
NO-264 and NO-1359. Both file notes originate from the Rascher couple and were set down simultaneously at two different places. File notes as such [ ... ]