even be charged with an omission. Every omission must be based on an "expected action". This expected action must also, however, be a "necessary act [ ... ]
Dr. Rascher, never the civilians Dr. Ruff and Dr. Romberg. The second condition for the criminality of an offense of omission is that it can be pro [ ... ]
I wish to state once again that in view of the over-all situation it was not possible for Romberg to save the experimental subject and thus prevent [ ... ]
among the roughly 40 heads of institutes and departments of the DVL, which employed about 2000 German people. Dr. Ruff, formerly the chief of my cl [ ... ]
inmates for these particularly dangerous and extremely painful experiments." The same must be true for Dr. Romberg. He even was requested by Himmle [ ... ]
was, besides his chosen task of airplane research, the urge to do his duty in a grave war and to help the population of Germany in its defense again [ ... ]
chamber out of Dachau against the expressed, will of Rascher and Himmler. By doing so, he not only prevented further experiments but he also, by sto [ ... ]
Court. 1. Official Transcript of the American Military Tribunal in the matter of the United States of America against Karl Brandt, et al, defendants, [ ... ]
The handling of the Weltz case on the part of the prosecutor. It is part of the peculiarities of this trial - unequalled in kind, and scope by any [ ... ]
The letter of HIMMLER of 24 July 1941, mentioned in document No. 263, exhibit No. 47, page 59 of the German and page 56 of the English document book [ ... ]