obligated to use the numerous excerpts and quotations from authors singly, and to give the basis in law for each specific case. Perhaps in a halfhour [ ... ]
this was a basic opinion, which may be proved through parallel cases. These parallel cases apply, first of all, to the example of the planning of the [ ... ]
to these documents, about 14 in number. The document C-12, GB-226, accuses Raeder that on the 30th of December 1939 he decreed, and I quote: "Greek [ ... ]
THE PRESIDENT: But you made no objection to them; you didn't object to 53 or 54. SIR DAVID[ ... ]
out the large danger, which consisted in the fact that Norway might fall into the hands of the Allies and that then the war would be lost for Germany. [ ... ]
gentlemen discussed the previous plan that I admit had misfired through German occupation of Norway. But they did discuss the matter of how the iron- [ ... ]
Raeder, referring to Document C-152, that Raeder was responsible for the occupation of Greece. That is an accusation that was not made against Ribben [ ... ]
were rejected in Ribbentrop's case. SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: My Lord, I didn't do the actual checking myself, but Major [ ... ]
the Ribbentrop documents went through these and compared the two, and he gave me that which forms the basis of our note. That is the position. I ca [ ... ]
DR. SIEMERS: May I perhaps say one word to what Sir David said regarding group "D"? There was no objection because th [ ... ]