the word with all respect, that they are not admissible. THE PRESIDENT: Now, Dr. Seidl. DR. SEI [ ... ]
The Prosecution has submitted this to show the development of the NSDAP. Many document books were submitted to the Court to prove the increase members [ ... ]
by the signatory powers in certain senses the Germans and the defendants had the right to rearm and wouldhave that tendency, and that in itself is an [ ... ]
THE PRESIDENT: One more question I should like to ask you: Are you saying that the fourteen Points which were laid dow [ ... ]
aspect, that is the relevance of evidence for research into the subject at hand, that is, the inner side. purely objectively was an infraction of the [ ... ]
practical aspect of the case is concerned, I must agree with Sir David -and I am speaking for myself only -- that decision on this question be postpon [ ... ]
It is understood, then, that Dr. Horn alone will address a short argument to the Tribunal? If it is not, then the-Tribunal will decide whether they w [ ... ]
first request be granted, that the legal documentary facts be submitted which would show the legal value of Versailles. SIR DAV [ ... ]
Now, if Dr. Dix will forgive me -- and I am sure the fault was mine -I don't quite appreciate what he calls his subjective argument. But in so far a [ ... ]
He wishes the Tribunal to try whether the Treaty of Versailles was signed under duress. Well, that, of course, would involve the whole consideration [ ... ]