Then, 27th of January 1944 - once it says 1943, and then again it says 1944. We did not vaccinate anybody in Schirmeck. As I remember, the figures [ ... ]
Q.- Then, you say these two entries show that the entry is not correct as far as the contents are concerned? A.- Yes, it is wrong. I can't say wha [ ... ]
around by the nose with this document for about five or ten minutes. DR. TIPP: Mr. President, I do not believe I am l [ ... ]
Q. Very well, Witness, the titer values of eight persons are listed here, probably you remember these are titer value [ ... ]
the witnesses attention to the portion of the document and ask what it means, and the witness will explain the meaning of the document. [ ... ]
A. Yes. Q. Was she such a sloppy worker as this document seems to indicate that sh [ ... ]
number of such discrepancies in the document. I don't know if the Tribunal is interested in them. To me, however, the points which I have just been [ ... ]
The first entry says 14 May 1943. Then comes 10 October apparently also 1943, for a year is not given, then comes 27 January 1944. [ ... ]
Q Perhaps the witness can help us. Professor, was the entry on page 3, 27 January 1933? A[ ... ]
say about this. A If that were a real entry in a record, it would have to be so that one could understand the "S". [ ... ]