University Professor Dr. Karl Engisch of Heidelberg once more to my written plea for the information of the Tribunal. This document was not admitted [ ... ]
In his opening speech General Taylor pointed out that the application of Euthanasia to non-Germans would not have been permissible even if there had [ ... ]
pacity to prevent them. Decisive for him was: the thought, vorn out of compassion, to release the poor creatures from their sufferings painlessly a [ ... ]
THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal will now hear from counsel for defendant Pokorny. May it please the Tribunal, a few week [ ... ]
medical training that I could understand in detail in how far those purely medical reasons could actually convince the physician of the impossibilit [ ... ]
hand, his real motive could not have been so easily proved by the rulers of that time. I finally had to consider that the defendant Dr. Pokorny was [ ... ]
the fact that no experiments could have been undertaken on human beings with the drug proposed by Dr. Adolf Pokorny, and that furthermore this plant [ ... ]
I do not want to quote them in detail, but rather turn now to legal considerations as they come up in the case of the defendant, Dr. Adolf Pokorny. [ ... ]
examples only, are definded differently in AngloAmerican criminal laws than in the Russian or French criminal law systems. If in each zone of occup [ ... ]
prisoners of war. In the second part of the letter he occupies himself with the idea of undertaking sterilization, and he proposes to use the plant [ ... ]