time. The Reich Research Council in 1943 gave a research assignment on hospatitis to Prof. Hagen. At that time Rostock did not yet belong to the Re [ ... ]
Rostock had in no way any thing to do with them, neither as an advisor nor as a participant. A* the already mentioned third meeting of the Consultin [ ... ]
Rostock has dealt with the matter and I wish to call the attention of the Tribunal to the details within the closing brief. The same is valid for th [ ... ]
Brandt's, and thus also Rostock's, commission comprised not all medical affairs, but only special tasks as was testified quite clearly here by the w [ ... ]
had to come through Rostock's office. Schroeder has testified in his affidavit, Exhibit RO No. 10, that this was an erroneous description. For it ha [ ... ]
Rostock can he held responsible, i.e. for those which were subordinate to him and which he supervised. He had no subordinates in his position as Co [ ... ]
and Blome, to quote an instance. There is no need to go into the details of this. But considering this special case, let me emphasize the difference [ ... ]
be no room for such an interpretation, since a criminal character of the experiments was not recognizable for Rostock. d) In no single case was Ros [ ... ]
Conclusions Mr. President, Your Honors: If, at the conclusion of my examination of the evidence, I appeal once more to your sense of justice. I do [ ... ]
of the Wehrmacht branches. Above all Hitler refrained from interfering in Himller's or Grawitz' sphere. All too often in the Third Reich as in this [ ... ]