Court No. I, Case No. 1. contradictions between statements made by a witness and it is contended that the affidavit prepared by one party does not co [ ... ]
Court No. I, Case No. 1. is admitted I shall assign it the exhibit number 52. The document is the paper by Gill and Forbes. TH [ ... ]
Court No. I, Case No. 1. THE PRESIDENT: Counsel for the prosecution is correct that document 32 has not been introduce [ ... ]
Court No. I, Case No. 1. MR. HARDY: I have no objection, your Honor, but I have no record that the other four documents [ ... ]
THE PRESIDENT: Document 63 was received in evidence as Exhibit 43. Becker-Freyseng. MR. HARDY:< [ ... ]
I offered in the examination of Becker-Freyseng to support the testimony of the witness; and in the same way, I offered Document 64 during the direc [ ... ]
assignments, were in order. When this document was offered, and the prosecution objected, the Tribunal decided that the original had to be offered, [ ... ]
I suppose because we had Haagen here and heard him in direction testimony. THE PRESIDENT: Well, I have before me a c [ ... ]
I shall merely refer to the rest of the contents of this document. The next document which I offer is Becker-Freyseng No. 77, Exhibit number 61. I [ ... ]
The next document is Becker-Freyseng 79 , as Exhibit 63. It is an affidavit by Professor Dr. Achelis, the contents again a description of a researc [ ... ]