According to Inhibit 531, the Prosecution charges that KLEMM has committed a crime by collaborating in the order to assure the total war effort. Th [ ... ]
The issuing of this cover law was considered afvisable by the legal authorities for a special reason. Those administrative offices which had issue [ ... ]
assault while on official duty according to the provisions of the German penal code par. 340, 341 (Exh. Klemm 26). In order to provide the legal au [ ... ]
down for decades in the Code of Criminal Procedure and in the Judicature Act. The simplifications necessitated by the war however, have always str [ ... ]
the Tribunal that even in the dogmatics of German penal law efforts had already been made prior to 1933 to fit the constantly changing farts of life [ ... ]
The defendant Klemm encountered this uniform method of administrartion of justice, existing already for years when he assumed the Office of State Se [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. It is sufficient here out of the abundance of material to make reference to the Mettgenberg Exhibit 31, 32 and 44 as well [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. acquiesced to the sentences even when defects were revealed. The Prosecution therefore remained absolutely indebted for t [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. judges' letters in their final form and he allowed himself to discuss it with no one as to the subject matter nor even as [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. otherwise uniform in Reich territory. The witnesses KUESTER (English Protocoll page 8198, German transcript page 7859) an [ ... ]