the party desired to play first fiddle to a greater degree still, than the decree on the Martial Courts permitted. It must be attributed alone to [ ... ]
(Exh. 534) the Prosecution obviously wishes to prove that after KLEMM joined the Ministry of Justice the policy in clemency cases had become severe [ ... ]
days as missing and taking the special cases not recorded in the lists into consideration one cannot possibly arrive at a higher figure than 3500. [ ... ]
This fact, too, becomes evident from Exh. 253. According to the lists, only on five days, the exact dates of which are given, oral reports were made [ ... ]
was in these cases. Thus it is impossible to examine one way or the other whether KLEMM's decision was just or in just and therefore perhaps Inhum [ ... ]
The reproach of the Prosecution that the clemency procedure in itself was inhumane or was not in accordance with the importance of the grave decisio [ ... ]
extremely insecure, and who obviously belongs to the witnesses who now try to accuse their former colleagues in order to excuse themselves for their [ ... ]
establishes, whether KLEMM voted at all, and in favor of what he voted in each individual case. According to the principle in dubio pro re (in doub [ ... ]
In this circle of consultants and advises of the minister, KLEIM had no other position than the others, that is, the assistants, the sub-department [ ... ]
of the department at which KLEMM' as deputy of the Party Chancellery had no authority to give his definite consent. It results from KLEMM's various [ ... ]