Court III, Case III. The comparison in Note 120 is likewise erroneous. Klemm did not admit that he had decided on the report days of 21 June, 31 May, [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. the Police. Since the summer of 1944, after the trials have again been taken away from the Ministry of Justice, no further proc [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. that could possibly he said against his statements would be that he, as Under Secretary of State, has had the possibility to gai [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. 2654, German page 2639, Engl. p. 2656, German p. 2640, Engl. 2664, German p. 2648, Engl. p. 2868 et seq. German p. 2652). There [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. When in the fall of 1944 authorities originally in charge of the N.N. prisoners (military courts and police), requested their re [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. Tenkink and Hooykaas (Exh. 611, Klemm Exh. 80). The prosecution sent a copy of Klemm's testimony to these witnesses. Their obje [ ... ]
15 0ct.-M-BK-5-1-Sampson (Int. Steuer) connection Klemm wanted to say that it was a question of the institution and not the establishment or creat [ ... ]
15 0ct.-M-BK-5-2-Sampson (Int. Steuer) himself with the accusation of the co-defendant Joel. He refuses now just as he did it formerly at the time [ ... ]
the beginning of February 1944 pursuant to separate decrees issued a long time before. There was absolutely nothing to decide any more for Departm [ ... ]
ce offered the following has been established without doubt: The territory to which Sonnenburg was assigned was already declared operational territ [ ... ]