Court No. III, Case No. 3. possibilities based on realistic thought. If international practice goes to prove that the great powers decide in favor o [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. friendship agreement of 28 September 1939 (Schlegelberger Exhibit 149) which "determines the frontier between the interest [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. national law. Every shot by a soldier of the attacking party would be murder or attempted murder. It is perfectly clear [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No, 3. there is a wider concept of protectorate. It comprises all types of relationships of constitutional dependence. I refer [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. clearly expresses its opinion that the Czechoslovak State has perished. A day later, on 16 March 1939, the decree of the F [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. independently, but according to Article 5, paragraph 3 of the decree the confirmation by a Reich official was necessary, t [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. The documents I have submitted unanimously prove that all other countries took the events of 15 and 16 March as being a Ge [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. position, we start from the assumption that no valid annexation within the meaning of International Law had taken place, t [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. the era of the Polish Republic has already been ventilated in the defendant 's examination. So much for the question whet [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. No State when acting as occupation power can do without it. Here I refer to the occupation law of the Allies. There is on [ ... ]