under discussion. I want to say this right now. The fundamental discussion of this question before this Tribunal is necessary. It should be done [ ... ]
translation or improper transcript. He did not introduce anything. It was a decree. He used it. I am only saying that I realize Your Honor has [ ... ]
No number was given. It was the decree of February 21, 1940. THE WITNESS: This decree of the nullification plea has [ ... ]
THE PRESIDENT: The witness has now answered it to my entire satisfaction. Those figures were not given in the testimo [ ... ]
between systems of law outside of Germany, to me, is to, in the first place, bring in extraneous matters which will lead us far afield, and to an ex [ ... ]
state should be the decisive one. We know that we in Germany, and also it can be recognized by the Tribunal, had different conceptions of democracy [ ... ]
MR. LaFOLLETTE: I feel that the Prosecution is entitled to make a statement again. I need not reiterate my basic rea [ ... ]
obliged to follow the statements of the public prosecutor? A Yes, also before 1933. Q[ ... ]
Q I now proceed to another point. I again have to refer to your remarks according to which the judges before 1933 [ ... ]
A No direct influence. Q Did the Ministry approach the courts directly? [ ... ]