Official transcript of the American MilitaryTribunal in the matter of the United States of America against Jopef Alstoetter, et al, defendants, sitt [ ... ]
there is no further text to the speech, to the knowledge of the prosecution, in existence. That accounts for our inability to furnish any other par [ ... ]
the document, if immediately thereafter there appear certain parts of the document read by the defendant, the prosecution, I feel, is somewhat handi [ ... ]
entire exhibit doing before us, if that is not called to our attention by opposing Counsel, we would be required to search for it. We think it is th [ ... ]
discretionary Units of the Court, we are entitled to -or the defense are entitled, rather, to call to our attention portions of your exhibit.
DR. SCHILF: Counsel for Defendants Klemm and Mettgenberg. Mr. President, may I call the attention of the Tribunal [ ... ]
permitted to include relevant passages in a document book. THE PRESIDENT: The exhibits are admitted in their entiret [ ... ]
the International Military Tribunal to which Dr. Kubeschok refers, there was a change. I make no point because I am sure he is speaking in good fai [ ... ]
decision of the Tribunal yesterday is definitely reasonable and economical. If an exhibit has been submitted by the Prosecution, the question arise [ ... ]
What is tho consequence of that opinion? If the prosecutor reads from the document, then the defense, of course, has the same fundamental interest [ ... ]