COURT III, CASE III legitimately try and punish enemy persons charged with infractions of tho rules of war, if the accused is a prisoner of war and [ ... ]
COURT III, CASE III ity, in particular murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian popul [ ... ]
COURT III, CASE III Judgment, Volume 1, pages 221-222). Under American law (National Defense Act of 4 June 1920) a military court or commission may [ ... ]
COURT III, CASE III visions of Control Council Law No. 10 and Ordinance 7. The judges of these tribunals set up under Law No. 10 and Ordinance 7 ar [ ... ]
held by the IMT: "The Signatory Powers created this Tribunal, defined the law it was to administer and made regulations for the proper conduct of t [ ... ]
Under the doctrine of the Quirin and Yamashita cases, the Allied Powers, or either of them, have the right to try and punish individual defendants i [ ... ]
This Tribunal has ruled that under no provision of Law No. 10 was conspiracy made a separate substantive and punishable crime. But the defendants ma [ ... ]
spiracy to initiate or wage an aggressive war is a crime against peace. The defendants are not charged with having committed or conspired to commit [ ... ]
the co-belligerents, or satellites, or held high position in the financial, industrial, or economic life of any such country." This language in det [ ... ]
usage omits no element of the crime of conspiracy. As a, rule there cam be no such thing as aiding and abetting without some previous agreement or [ ... ]