would be unsuitable to deprive Jews of this right without a legal regulation, we find that on 27 January 1942 the report of a conference shows the f [ ... ]
of justice. Evading this decision by a compromise might mean encroaching upon the rights of a fellow citizen in favor of a Jew. This kind of settlem [ ... ]
Court III Case III case involving the claim of the right of Jews to proceed in forma pauperis must first be submitted to him. On 5 March 1942 a [ ... ]
Court III Case III now having been passed, he recommends that the judges take a uniform line depriving the Jew of the right to proceed in forma p [ ... ]
Court III Case III nevertheless a part of the governmentally organized plan for the persecution of the Jews, not only by murder and imprisonment b [ ... ]
Court III Case III The defendant stated that ho did not observe and could not discover any abuse at Mauthausen. In this connection the testimony o [ ... ]
Court III Case III were in a concentration camp because we were of the opinion that only the Administration of Justice should decide these question [ ... ]
camps were merely for pleasure or for general education. He also advised other judges to make like investigations. We concede that the concentrati [ ... ]
Court III Case III custody is not any more within their control. This attitude of the courts cannot be approved, but it is psychologically under [ ... ]
Court III Case III become a habit. Rothenberger was not happy with his work in Berlin. In his farewell speech on leaving Hamburg, he exuberantly [ ... ]