Court III, Case III. are the orders of the Fuehrer." As will be seen, the foregoing pronouncements by the leaders in the field of Nazi jurisprudence [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. verdict does not meet with your approval. The judges are responsible to you, my Fuehrer; they are conscious of this responsibil [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. By reference to case histories we will illustrate three different methods by which Hitler, through the Ministry of Justice, impo [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. As a final illustration of a general practice, we refer to the case of the Jew Luftgas, who had been sentenced to two and one-ha [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. responsibility, it will find within the limits of the law the decision which is the most satisfactory for the life of the commun [ ... ]
A number of Jews applied for the coffe ration, but did not receive it, being "excluded from the distribution per se". The food authorities imposed [ ... ]
doubt that the purpose of the judicial guidance was sinister and was known to be such by the Ministry of Justice and by the judges who received the [ ... ]
the point of view of the State." He continues: "As a general rule, the judge of the People's Court must get used to regarding the ideas and intent [ ... ]
from the Party standpoint. On 29 March 1941 Schlegelberger received a letter from the Chief of the Reich Chancellery protesting against the sentenc [ ... ]
On 3 March 1942 Bormann gave his approval in general terms to Thierack's proposal. A like approval was given by Dr. Lammers on 13 November 1942. I [ ... ]