ed the verdict to he a false judgment. We cannot believe that the gentlemen in the highest office contrary to their conviction would not have avail [ ... ]
If an Anti-Fascist or a Jew reproaches Rothaug with being an AntiSemite, then he must accept this, but if people do this such as Groben, Engert, Fe [ ... ]
arrest had been issued without any grounds, his unavoidable duty would have been, according to Article 123 of the code of criminal procedure, to rev [ ... ]
discussed, this with the public prosecutor end his co-workers. When the opinion was uttered that this document could be put into the internal files [ ... ]
Court III Case III neither did he present the files to the court of appeal as would have been his legal duty, he rather forwarded them to the pu [ ... ]
Court III Case III terms of the destruction of a document (Rothaug exhibit 194). In his discussions with Ankenbrand Rothaug only thought of thi [ ... ]
Court III Case III 3585/86) that he was bound by the Prosecutor's motion is untrue. (Exh. 69). According to it, the decision in this matter re [ ... ]
Court III Case III application on the decision of the Reich Supreme Court, that any activity aiming at sexual satisfaction was to be regarded as [ ... ]
Court III Case III
THE PRESIDENT: We will proceed to hear it then. Go ahead, Dr. Brieger may be prepared.
Court III Case III These generally recognized principles also guided the later verdict. Rothaug's views on the swearing in of Frau Seiler had n [ ... ]