hospital, wherefore also the Court rejected, the application refusing another expert's opinion, because the opinion of the physician was considered [ ... ]
with attempted murder and based his charge on the decree concerning violent criminals (Rothaug Exh. 150), which absolutely demanded the death sente [ ... ]
17 0ct.-A-BK-19 & 20-4-Cook (Int. Hahn) jegted to political persecution. In cross examination Rothaug was accused of having made far-reaching corr [ ... ]
adverse criticism, though the latter never thought of such a possibility. Kolimer understood, that he had asked wrongly, No steps were taken agai [ ... ]
17 0ct.A-BK-19 & 20-6-Cook (Int. Hahn) tion Exh. 245). The judgment of the Special Court of 6 May 1940 sentenced Windel as a dangerous habitual cr [ ... ]
If we aid to this what becomes clear from the preamble of the judgment of the Reich Supreme Court, that the Chief Reich Public Prosecutor had br [ ... ]
fact that the lower court has rejected the assumption of a public enemy, for the reasons that the defendant was suffering from a series of constitu [ ... ]
verdict. On the basis of all statements made, the chronological events happened as follows: Katzenberger was arrested approximately in March 194 [ ... ]
tor's office. After further investigations charges wore brought against Katzenberger and Seiler in March 1942, against Katzenberger for a crime acc [ ... ]
3) The judgment was not only the opinion of Rothaug, but the opinion of the Hurnberg Special Court. Consisting of 3 judges, and represented their [ ... ]