Court III Case III fact that the Prosecution has the procedural right to bring to the knowledge of the Tribunal, out of the documents collected, [ ... ]
Court III Case III Gestapo methods and SS. It is a matter of course that this cannot possibly be so convincing as Dr. Rothenberger's own report [ ... ]
Court III Case III and depicting their own conducts correspondingly, are given more credit. With regard to the question of how to judge these t [ ... ]
Court III Case III has not been charged with special responsibility. II. Case 9/21 of the Prosecution: Dr. Rothenberger can only be charged w [ ... ]
Court III Case III that it was replaced by a strict adherence on the part of the Minister to Hitler's decrees. A much more decisive factor to b [ ... ]
Court III Case III been kept from him to start with, which information is a necessary prerequisite for assuming any responsibility. On page 4, [ ... ]
Court III Case III The Special Courts were established in 1933 by virtue of a decree of the Reich Ministry of Justice and was constitutionally p [ ... ]
Court III Case III characteristics of a political Court par excellence, but of courts handling in the main criminal cases in general, in support [ ... ]
Court III Case III inconclusive to interpret this particular decision as a general tendency on the part of Rothenberger to render the administra [ ... ]
carrying out of this decree, as this was up to the department IV exclusively. The intention and purpose of these measures was outspokenly, as is sh [ ... ]