The first alternative refers to the increase of punishment against a dangerous habitual criminal, the second to the order of a measure of security [ ... ]
for four months with respective reference, and a defense counsel is assigned for the defendant on account of the changed legal situation. A brief [ ... ]
to two years imprisonment because of a malicious acts offense. Obviously, the Prosecution wants to prove by this case that Oeschey took part in the [ ... ]
administration. Therefore, this case does not incriminate but clears Oeschey. Finally, I want to go into the cases Heubeck and Sauer for which t [ ... ]
Court had to recognize such a position of constraint of the defendants , and that is not the case. The defendants would have made their defense in [ ... ]
Thus, Oeschey had no knowledge of such measures, nor did he assist in this case nor in any other case in delivering to the Gestapo persons whom he h [ ... ]
legislative power is authorized to issue provisions concerning Summary Courts, as was done by the Law of 15 February 1945. Insofar as civilian cou [ ... ]
IV), according to which the civil courts martial could only pronounce death sentences, acquit the defendant, or remove the case to the ordinary jud [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case III impossible, to establish merely from the witnesses depositions, whether the decisions passed were materially correct or not. [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case III Martial could not evade trying and judging the case, after the charge had been brought before it, Oeschey did not exert any i [ ... ]