Court III, Case III. my opinion, cleared it up. On principle, I am nowever of the opinion that cases for which the material is so insufficiently sub [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. and Hoffmann who were involved in this case. A comparison of his statements with excerpts from the "Fraenkische Tageszeitung" o [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. the decree concerning Poles and Jews which was issued after this date but only by virtue of the general criminal law which was a [ ... ]
A similar deficiency of evidence exists in two cases to which the Prosecution called special attention and which it dealt with in various affidavits [ ... ]
of the principles for his administration of justice set forth by Oeschey as a witness which I already dealt with in detail in the general statements [ ... ]
as the guilt of the two defendants was proved by circumstantial evidence, the Special Court was obliged to consider whether it was an extremely sev [ ... ]
results that the court took in the course of the trial a recess for deliberation and finally dismissed the case against Wdown inasmuch as Wdown had [ ... ]
Prosecution tries to minimize that case so as to criticize the extent of the penalties, but I should like to refer you to the testimony by Wurm, my [ ... ]
had expressly been asked, did not apply for the appointment of such a defense counsel, nor was the case legally or factually complicated. He was giv [ ... ]
The Code of Criminal Procedure makes a distinction between a change of the legal point of view (Article 265 of the Code of Criminal Procedure), i.e [ ... ]