Court III - Case III one thing one will be able to establish again and again, i.e. that defendant Lautz has acted as he believed he had to act accord [ ... ]
Court III - Case III ferred by the Reich Minister of Justice to the following four Special Courts: Cologne; Dortmund; Kiel and Berlin. Tho People's [ ... ]
Court III - Case III Germany and when the basic decrees of the Reich Minister of Justice already had been practiced for several months. The Prosecut [ ... ]
Court III - Case III 5929) who had stated, that the Reich Prosecuting Authorities and the People's Court had treated just the NN-proceedings with par [ ... ]
with the outside world during the transport." These were precautionany measures also customary in other cases. However, I shall not omit to point [ ... ]
Court III - Case III in regard to NN-prisoners. In addition, Lautz did the following: When it had become evident that in some cases the indictment [ ... ]
Court III - Case III the prosecution of a small number of the NN-cases, he found himself face to face with the following situation: The Military Cou [ ... ]
Court III - Case III defendant Lautz was occupied to such a degree as a result of the events of 20 July 1944 that he was obliged to lot Parrisius, th [ ... ]
Thus, Lautz described this phase of the NE-proceedings as witness and his statements were not refuted; (Tr. 5933) his testimony is supported by the [ ... ]
"The Prosecution furthermore attempted to prove that within the Reich itself German penal law was abused towards a terroristic suppression of politi [ ... ]