Court III, Case III. sentences which were pronounced by the People's Court and only following indictments submitted by Lautz. Why such a responsibil [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. People's Court. He explained this fact during his interrogation, showing an especially tragic case (Tr. 5788). As he convincin [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. the prosecution of certain delicts, committed in this connection, did not fall under his jurisdiction as Reich Chief Public Pros [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. evidence in this respect has shown the following: Penal sentences were carried out by the prosecuting authorities assigned to t [ ... ]
Court III, Case III. by the prosecution exhibits 134 (NG-597, III A 151/163), 267 (NG-614, IV A 76) and 266 (NG-598, IV S), concerning such matters; [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. Since the penal institutions did not come within the field of competency of the Reich Public Prosecution and since Lautz h [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. practice. Neither did Lautz have anything to do with the events which, as stated by the prosecution, occurred in some pen [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. happenings in penal institutions and for the transfer of prisoners than he can be held responsible for the executions whic [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. alteration until the collapse, with the sole exception that, according to a general decree of the autumn of 1943, pardon r [ ... ]
Court No. III, Case No. 3. burg for weeks, in part even for months. In spite of this, he did not undertake anything to hasten the decision of the Mi [ ... ]