[ ... ] processed we will then submit it formally. THE PRESIDENT: Counsel, this Document No. 1639. MR. HARDY which the court does not have a copy. Now, we will turn to Document NO-1639, which is offered for identification as Prosecution Exhibit No. 474, which [ ... ]
[ ... ] PRESIDENT: Counsel, you do not content that these two documents, both bearing the number NO-1639, are attached documents? MR : But then of course the duplication of the NO-1639 is in fact an error. MR. HARDY: We don't claim it was an error [ ... ]
[ ... ] . MR. HARDY: Then I will give one Document the NO-1639 and the other Document NO-1639-A. Document 1639 will bear prosecution exhibit 474 for identification purposes, and Document NO-1639-A, Prosecution Exhibit 475 for identification. I now wish to take up the Document NO-1639 [ ... ]
[ ... ] treatment, yes. A I can't remember. Q Well, now, we have this document NO-1639-A which is offered for identification. Now this is a letter from you to SS-Sturmbannfuehrer Dr. Brandt dated 4 June 1941. Now this is Document NO-1639-A [ ... ]
[ ... ] Fuehrer SS on 27 May 1941; would you then be inclined to think that this was the list attached to the Document No. NO 1639-A? A [ ... ]
[ ... ] upper left hand corner of this letter, which is signed by Grawitz, and which you say you did not send with the cover letter NO-1639A; and there appears there the symbols Roman IV, and then a dash and Arabic 102-41, which is precisely the same code number as is on your cover letter NO. 1639A; according to [ ... ]
[ ... ] JUDGE SEBRING: In the English translations before the Tribunal both documents NO-1639 and NO-1639-A appear to be [ ... ]
[ ... ] . HARDY: The next document, Your Honor, is NO-1639, which is introduced as Prosecution Exhibit 474. It is found on page 5622 of the record. It was [ ... ]
[ ... ] > That is correct, Your Honor. JUDGE SEBRING: And yet you have three pages of one document called No. NO-1639. O-1639 and NO-1639-a. One is a letter of Grawitz and that's perhaps why it indicates 1 of 3 pages, because we broke them up [ ... ]