the Wehrmacht had caused or promoted these experiments, because it had an "interest" in them. Equating objective interest in research with illegal [ ... ]
This submission of evidence by the prosecution, based on general reasoning in the case Handloser, is misleading, because it connects things which ar [ ... ]
which were under Professor Handloser's supervision are not charged with any of the experiments which are indicted here, even though nearly all field [ ... ]
the fact that the accusation of "special responsibility for and participation in" are synonymous and can only mean that the defendant had participat [ ... ]
attempt to transfer the principles of political responsibility to criminal law. Military Tribunal No. 2 took the same point of view in the sentence [ ... ]
when questioned by the prosecution, stated that he took the responsi bility within the sphere of activity for everything he instigated by an order, [ ... ]
The prosecution apparently assumes that the highest authority (i.e. chief) of a large sphere of activity has knowledge of all happenings within this [ ... ]
The Prosecution described the activities of the subordinates in a general form, as for instance: Visit Prof. Eyer - Dr. Schmidt at Buchenwald. Visit [ ... ]
c) supervise obedience to the general principles of military and medical-military service. The crux in this trial; which is a trial of Professor Ha [ ... ]
were treated by training group C. If problems arose, whose decision, according to the opinion of a Chief of the Institute, should be reserved for a [ ... ]