DECREES, REGULATIONS, ANNOUNCEMENTS [The
German publication entitled "Verfuegungen, Anordnungen, Bekanntgaben"] Pp. 430-39.
Security Police
Cooperation of the Party offices with the Secret State Police
[Gestapo].
In a summary of all the previously issued decrees on the cooperation between the Party and the Gestapo I refer to the following and ordain: .
' 1. To the Gestapo has been entrusted the mission by the
Fuehrer to watch over and to eliminate all enemies of the Party and the National Socialist State as well as all disintegrating forces of all kinds directed against both. The successful solution of this mission forms one of the most essential pre-requisites for the unhampered and frictionless work of the Party. The Gestapo, in their extremely difficult task, is to be granted support and assistance in every possible way by the NSDAP. The supervision of the Party itself does not come under the jurisdiction of the Gestapo.
I prohibit all offices of the Party, its organizations and associated groups to conduct investigations and interrogations regarding affairs which concern the Gestapo only. All occurrences of a poltical criminalistic nature are to be reported without prejudice along Party channels and as ever brought to the knowledge of the Gestapo immediately.
2. The secret state police must report automatically all occurrences of a criminal nature, even if it includes Party Members, to the responsible public prosecutor according to the laws of the National Socialist State, in force for all nationals. In such cases, the State police offices will notify, as before, the. county and Gauleiters concerned, of the reports made to the public prosecutor. Reports will include reasons for the incidents. In the interest of the movement the functionaries [Hoheitstrager]
219
219
1723—PS
are obliged to suspend, if necessary, the party members, after contacting the responsible Party Court; the latter will hold a public hearing, to decide on the temporary suspension.
Invitation of the leaders of offices in the Security Police and the Security Service to attend Party meetings.
In order to establish closer connections between all the offices of the Party and their organizations and the office leader of the Security Police and SD, the leader of the Party Chancellor asks that they should be invited in the future to all large official meetings of the Party.
The taking over of political offices by officials of the Gestapo
The Secret State police has the mission to safeguard the unhampered development of all forces active in the party and released by it in the National Socialistic State.
Since it is still in a state of being organised and the available officials and employees are very much in demand they are only to be employed in order to take over positions in the Party in as much as it is compatible with their official duties in the Secret State Police.
I, therefore, ask to check in every single case and in close harmony with the department of the Secret State Police concerned, whose leader welcomes the taking over of political functions by officials and employees of the Secret State Police, whether the transfer of political missions into the Party can be justified in the interest of the official obligations of the Secret State Police.
Presentation to the State Police upon request by Party offices
The Chief of the Security Police and SD has issued the annexed decrees of 29 March 1940 and 4 November 1940. It is ordered herewith that departments of the Secret State Police will be obliged to execute the presentation request when the same emanates from the Reichsleiters or the Gauleiters. If the request for presentation originates from subordinate departments of the party it will only be granted if particular interests of the State Police seem to warrant a presentation.
In the future the county administration and local administrations are to direct all requests through the district administration to the responsible department of the Secret State police.
220
Berlin, 29 March 1940 The Chief of the Security Police and SD I A 1 NR. 102/40—176 To all State police departments
By way of information to the Inspectors of the Security Police and SD.
Subject: Presentation to the State Police upon request by Party offices.
Repeated requests by Party offices for presentation to the State Police of Volksgenossen who did not heed the summons of the Party offices, cause the following regulations to be decreed :
1. If the district administration makes the request the same is to be granted as long as no important interests of the State Police interfere.
2. If a party office subordinate to the district administration requests the presentation, the same has to be denied in as far as no important interests of the State Police seem to warrant a presentation.
Signed: HEYDRICH Verified : Schoenbrunn of the Chancellery
Berlin SW 11 4 November 1940 The Chief of the Security Police and SD IB 1 NR 763/40-151 To All State Police Departments
By way of information to the Inspectors of the Security Police and SD
Subject: Presentation to State Police upon, request of Party Offices .
Reference: Decree of 29 March 1940 IA 1 NR 102/40-176
In supplement to my decree of 29 March 1940 I order that presentation requests by Reichsleiters be granted in so far as important interests of the State Police do not interfere.
Signed: HEYDRICH
Protective Custody
Protective custody must be viewed as the strongest measure in order to impressively instruct the Volksgenossen, who mali-
693257—46—15
221
1723—PS
1723—PS
ciously neglect their duties toward the community or endanger the security of the State, that they have to conform themselves to the universal interests and to adapt themselves to State discipline. Therefore it should only serve as a means of combatting real enemies of the Reich, but should never be used for the clarification or punishment of different or insignificant offenses.
An excessive use of protective custody, as well as its infliction without previous indisputable clarification of the state of affairs and the question of guilt, is neither justified with regard to the future of the one involved nor with respect to the reduction of its moral effect.
Therefore it must be expected that protective custody is only to be employed in really pressing and substantial cases.
I request that the county leaders be instructed orally to avoid any written communications; special emphasis on secrecy.
Protective Custody (Regulations)
Through the circular of the 25 January 1938, the Reich Minister of the Interior has issued new regulations regarding, the introduction of protective custody. In the following, I announce the wording of this decree for confidential information.
Berlin 25 Jan. 1938
The Reich Minister of the Interior
The following regulations regarding protective custody go into effect on the 1 February 1938. At the same time, the following are rescinded:
a. My decree of 12 April 1934—I 3311 A/28.2 along with the supplement of 26 April 1934 and 10 July 1934 (directed to governments of the states and to the Reich statthalters).
b. My decree of 12 April 1935—VI B 757A/3014 along with the supplementary decree of 1 June 1935 VI B 11568/3014 (directed to the' governments of the states, Reichstatthalter, Prussian presidents of government districts).
c. My decree of 17 June 1935—III P 3311/329 (directed to the state government and the Reichstatthalter.)
d. The decree of office of Secret State Police of 3 July 1934— B Nr. 19582 HID (directed to the presidents of the Prussian government districts).
222
1723-PS
e. The decree of the Political Police Commander of the Lands of the 9 Sept 1935—B. Nr. 37840/35 HID (direct to the Political police of the states and the Prussian State Police offices).
Article 1 Admissibility
Protective custody can be decreed as a coercive measure of the Secret State Police against persons who endanger the security of the people and the state through their attitude, in order to counter all aspirations of enemies of the people and state.
Protective Custody shall not be decreed for penal purposes or as a substitute for punitive arrest. Punishable offenses have to be decided finally by the courts.
Article 2 Competence
1. The Secret State Police exclusively is competent for the application of protective custody.
2. Motions in behalf of the application of protective custody have to be directed to the Secret State police through the State police offices. Every motion has to be substantiated in detail; the statements of the arrested person have to be considered in it. A copy of the hearing of the person temporarily apprehended has to be forwarded immediately.
3. Protective custody may only be inflicted if the accused has previously had a hearing on offenses imputed to him.
Article 3 Temporary Arrest
1. The Secret State police bureau, the offices of the State police director and of the State Police are authorized under the provisions of par. 1 to order the temporary arrest of persons:
a. If it is feared that the freedom will be abused for activities hostile to the state.
b. If danger of under-cover activities exists.
c. If there is suspicion of escape.
2. The accused has to be notified at the latest within 24 hours after the arrest. He is to be heard on the grounds for the infliction of the temporary arrest according to protocol.
3. A temporarily arrested person has to be released at the latest after an elapse of 10 days from the day of apprehension if the Secret State police bureau has in the meantime not decreed protective custody (5).
* * * * * * - * Article 6 Execution
The protective custody has to be executed generally in the State Concentration Camps.
223
1723-PS
Article 7 Duration
1. Protective custody shall only be upheld as long as it serves its purpose.
2. The Secret State police bureau authorizes release from protective custody. For that reason the bureau investigates periodically but not exceeding 3 months, whether the protective custody should be cancelled. The release must have taken place, at the latest, on the third day after the lifting of the protective custody.
Article 8 Foreigners
As a matter of principle deportation procedure has to be carried out against foreigners who have been taken into protective custody unless particular reasons interfere.
Article 9 Executory Regulations
The Chief of the Security Police issues the necessary regulations for the execution.
Circular order for the cooperation of party offices with the Gestapo, and regulations for the use of protective custody against "real enemies of the Reich"
Authors
Wilhelm Frick (Minister of the Interior; chief of Nazi delegation, Reichstag; admin. Plenipotentiary)
Wilhelm Frick
German Nazi official (1877-1946)
- Born: 1877-03-12 (Alsenz)
- Died: 1946-10-16 (Nuremberg)
- Country of citizenship: Germany
- Occupation: diplomat; lawyer; politician
- Member of political party: German Völkisch Freedom Party; National Socialist Freedom Movement; Nazi Party
- Member of: AGV München; Thule Society
- Participant in: Aryanization; Beer Hall Putsch; International Military Tribunal (role: defendant)
- Position held: Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia (period: 1943-08-24 through 1945-05-04; replaces: Konstantin von Neurath); Reichsminister des Innern (period: 1933-01-30 through 1943-08-20; replaced by: Heinrich Himmler; replaces: Franz Bracht); member of the Reichstag of Nazi Germany; member of the Reichstag of the Weimar Republic
Reinhard Heydrich (Chief of Security Police (SIPO) and Security Service (SD))
Reinhardt Heydrich
Most Horrible German Nazi SS and Gestapo police official and main architect of the Holocaust Genocide (1904-1942)
- Born: 1904-03-07 (Halle (Saale))
- Died: 1942-06-04 (Prague)
- Country of citizenship: German Reich
- Occupation: aircraft pilot; fencer; military personnel; politician
- Member of political party: Nazi Party
- Member of: Deutschvölkischer Schutz und Trutzbund; Schutzstaffel (series ordinal: 10120)
- Military rank: Obergruppenführer; SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer
- Military branch: Schutzstaffel
Date: 25 January 1938
Literal Title: Extract from Verfuegungen Anordnungen Bekanntgaben p.430-39[.] Security Police[.] Cooperation of the Party offices with the Secret State Police (Gestapo).
Defendant: Wilhelm Frick
Total Pages: 7
Language of Text: English
Source of Text: Nazi conspiracy and aggression (Office of United States Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946.)
Evidence Code: PS-1723
Citation: IMT (page 1400)
HLSL Item No.: 450969
Notes:Frick is identified as the author of the circular order for cooperation (14 Dec 1938) in the Blue Set (vol. 27, p. 492), and the regulations on protective custody (25 Jan 1938) were issued by him. Heydrich issued the orders dated 1940.
Trial Issues
Concentration camp system (administration, forced labor, abuse of inmates)… Persecution of political, religious, and ethnic ("racial") groups (IMT, NM…
Document Summary
PS-1723: Circular from Frick, 25 January 1938: all police matters of a political nature are the business of the Gestapo; directives for ordering and applying "protective custody"
PS-1723: Confidential information by the NSDAP party chancellery, 9 Oct. 1942, entitled "Preparatory measures for the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe, rumors concerning the situation of the Jews in the East."
Confidential information by the NSDAP party chancellery, 9 Oct. 1942, entitlement "Preparatory measures for the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe, Rumors concerning the Situation of the Jews in the East."
Confidential information by the NSDAP party chancellery, 9 Oct. 1942, entitled "Preparatory measures for the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe, Rumors concerning the Situation of the Jews in the East."
Confidential information by the NSDAP party chancellery, 9 Oct. 1942, entitled "Preparatory measures for the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe, rumors concerning the situation of the Jews in the East."