[ ... ] behalf of the Defense testified and the corresponding page in the English transcript. These lists are not in evidence. They are simply for the appeared, and the corresponding page in the transcript. For purposes of identification, they should be marked Exhibit 675. The second list is with respect [ ... ]
[ ... ] point. On Friday we received the German transcript for the cross-examination before the recess. I have ascertained that some mistakes have occurred in this transcript, which are probably due to the fact that General Kuntze has taked somewhat fast, and not very clearly, and that for this reason the [ ... ]
[ ... ] the record should show that there has been delivered to the Defense Counsel approximately forty copies of the German transcript for Tuesday. The Defense Counsel of the transcript for the day in question. The Tribunal will be in recess until 1:30 this afternoon. (A recess was taken until 1330 hours [ ... ]
[ ... ] it was not correct in sense. I would, therefore, move that the English transcript for the second part of the morning session should be made on the basis of the German transcript -- that is, as proper translation of the German transcript into the English language. For the second morning session [ ... ]
[ ... ] situation, what document do you refer to? MR. FULKERSEN: I mean the actual court transcript, if you please, for the 6th of should begin 5754 and that has been carried on all through the transcript for the 7th and presumably for the following days. We have notified Major [ ... ]
[ ... ] Court No. V, Case VII like to put Major Bernstein on sometime tomorrow afternoon in rebuttal to this particular affidavit. It is Exhibit 172, your Honor, Geitner Exhibit 172. Finally, a very minor change on the transcript of the 27th of October: it appears in the English transcript, the date of the [ ... ]
[ ... ] not take consideration of it? Unless you want to do it for the purpose of the transcript-doesn't it all go into the transcript? THE PRESIDENT: Very well. [ ... ]
[ ... ] case of the United States vs. Karl Brandt, et al, before Military Tribunal I of these Tribunals, transcript for the 16 of December 1946, pages 493 and 494, where Mr. McHaney made his application for the witness, and the transcript in the same court for the following day, December 17. Judge Sebring [ ... ]
[ ... ] . DR. WEISGERBER (Attorney for the defendant Speidel): During the interval I was told by the interpreter that a mistake had occasion this mistake in translation occurred and I don't know how we can get any further until the transcript of the record is submitted. I am really [ ... ]
[ ... ] will therefore stand in adjournment until tomorrow morning at 9:30 at the place to which has been assigned the trial of Case No. 7 for Tribunal number 5 . Therefore, the motion for a continuance for a two-week period as previously stated will be denied. In that connection, I also might state that we gave [ ... ]